Loading...
Ammon Foothill - Study_Traffic Impact Study Update 3.25.22 1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, UT 84043 p 801.766.4343 1 www.halesengineering.com MEMORANDUM Date: March 22, 2022 To: Nate Meikle From: Hales Engineering Subject: Ammon BCP Trip Generation Comparison UT21-1969 This memorandum discusses the study completed for the BCP development located in Ammon, Idaho. A prior TIS dated November 24, 2021, had been completed based on a prior site plan. Since then, unit counts have been updated and the purpose of this memorandum is to compare trip generation and the roadway network between the two plans and to determine whether a new TIS would be needed based on this information. A site plan is contained in Appendix A. Project Description The proposed project is anticipated to contain residential apartment, townhome, and single-family units as well as some commercial. A comparison between the new and old land uses is shown in Table 1. Table 1: Project Land Uses Land Use Prior Intensity Current Intensity Single-family detached housing 2,644 Units 1,590 units Townhomes 498 Units 990 units Apartments - 560 units Commercial / Office 100,000 sq. ft. 100,000 sq. ft. The prior study assumed a total of 3,142 residential units, while the current study assumes 3,140 units. Trip Generation Trip generation for the development was calculated using trip generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. A comparison of these trips with the prior plan is shown in Table 2. 03/22/2022 1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, UT 84043 p 801.766.4343 2 www.halesengineering.com Table 2: Trip Generation Period Prior Plan Current Plan Weekday Daily 25,944 trips 25,992 trips Morning Peak Hour 2,226 trips 1,903 trips Evening Peak Hour 2,720 trips 2,240 trips As can be seen, the new plan is anticipated to produce slightly more daily trips and fewer peak hour trips. Morning peak hour trips are anticipated to drop by approximately 15 percent and evening peak hour trips are anticipated to drop by approximately 18 percent. It is not anticipated that this drop in trips would have a significant effect on the improvements that were recommended in the TIS. Roadway Network Overall, the new roadway network remains similar to the network in the prior plan. An additional access is planned to connect to 1st Street, which if anything, would likely improve the level of service (LOS) at the project intersections onto 1st Street. The other notable change is the consolidation of accesses onto 21st Street. The prior plan had three, while the current plan contains two. It is not anticipated that this will have a significant impact on the remaining southeast access as it is on the eastern edge of the property where little background traffic passes. Conclusions The current site plan changes little from a traffic perspective when compared the prior plan. The current plan has removed two residential units and has shifted toward land uses that produce lower peak hour trip rates. It is not anticipated that the lowered peak hour trip generation will have a significant impact on the improvements recommended in the TIS, nor is it anticipated that the revised roadway network would necessitate any additional improvements that were not recommended previously. For these reasons, it was determined that the TIS should still be adequate for the current site plan. If you have any questions, please contact us at 801.766.4343. 1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, UT 84043 p 801.766.4343 www.halesengineering.com APPENDIX A Site Plan VILLAGE 2AREA = 65.8 ACNET AREA = 58.0 ACROAD AREA = 4.0 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 3.8 ACVILLAGE 4AREA = 81.0 ACNET AREA = 69.2 ACROAD AREA = 5.0 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 6.8 ACVILLAGE 6AREA = 33.9 ACNET AREA = 32.3 ACROAD AREA = 1.3 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 0.3 ACREGIONAL PARKAREA = 26.4 ACVILLAGE 5AREA = 32.8 ACNET AREA = 31.1 ACROAD AREA = 0.3 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 1.4 ACVILLAGE 3AREA = 60.7 ACNET AREA = 58.3 ACROAD AREA = 0.9 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 1.5 ACNEIGHBORHOOD 5AREA = 59.3 ACNET AREA = 48.7 ACROAD AREA = 3.5 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 7.1 ACNEIGHBORHOOD 4AREA = 59.1 ACNET AREA = 51.9 ACROAD AREA = 2.1 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 5.1 ACNEIGHBORHOOD 3AREA = 32.8 ACNET AREA = 29.9 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 2.9 ACNEIGHBORHOOD 2GROSS AREA = 45.0 ACNET AREA = 43.0 ACROAD AREA = 0.6 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 1.4 ACNEIGHBORHOOD 1AREA = 81.6 ACNET AREA = 74.0 ACGREEN SPACE AREA = 7.6 ACNEIGHBORHOOD 1NEIGHBORHOOD 1NEIGHBORHOOD 2OPEN SPACEAREA = 19.9 ACNET AREA = 18.8 ACROAD AREA = 1.1 ACCOMMERCIALAREA = 7.9 ACVILLAGE 1AREA = 48.2 ACNET AREA = 45.2 ACROAD AREA = 3.0 ACLEI PROJECT #:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SCALE:DATE:SHEET5---REVISIONS4---3---2---1---ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS3302 N. Main StreetSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555Fax: 801.798.9393office@lei-eng.comwww.lei-eng.com- A Utah Corporation -NOT FOR CON S T RU C T ION1"=250'1LEI PROJECT #:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SCALE:DATE:SHEET2021-0020BLS/MJV5---REVISIONS4---3---2---1---3/15/2022ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS3302 N. Main StreetSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555Fax: 801.798.9393office@lei-eng.comwww.lei-eng.comFLAGSHIP HOMES CITY OF AMMON, IDAHO - A Utah Corporation -CONCEPT PLANGDM/JWA2500125250NORTHSCALE:1"=250'S. 52ND E.21ST STREET S 1ST STREET LONA NORTH RD 55TH E