Council Minutes 11/21/1966
li
I
I
I
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF AMMON, BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO
November 21, 1966 - 7:30 p.m.
The Mayor and City Council of the City of Ammon, Bonneville
County, Idaho, met in a special meeting at the City Hall at the
regular meeting place in Ammon, Idaho, on November 21, 1966, at
7:30 o'clock p.m., there being present upon roll call, the Mayor,
Mel Richardson, and Councilmen, Keith Brown, Leo Heer, Roy
Southwick and George Wehman. Also present were Dermont Ricks,
Clerk, and W. J. Anderson, counsel.
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor who announced
that the purpose of the meeting was to hear protests, if any,
upon the creation of a Local Improvement District for the im-
provement of Brookfield Lane in the City of Ammon from that
street's intersection with Ammon Way continuing Eastward therefrom
for a distance of approximately one-fourth mile for the grading,
surfacing with asphaltic concrete and the erection and installation
of bridges over canals on said Brookfield Lane, all within the
corporate limits of the City of Ammon.
That upon the following written protests received and had
been filed at the Office of the City Clerk
Name
Address
Reason for Protest
1. Rex S. Shurtliff
Route 3, Brookfield
Lane, Ammon, Idaho
Desires paving but objects
to bridges as too much
expense.
Desires paving but objects
to bridges as too much
expense.
2. Herb Shurtliff
205 Chatham Drive
Idaho Falls, Idaho
3. Alton Howell
Route 1, Box 347
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Desires paving but objects
to bridges as too much
expense.
The Mayor then asked if there were any persons present who had
any additional protests and Harvey Crandall, Jr., of Route 3,
Brookfield Lane, Ammon, Idaho, who was present, stated that he was
a property owner within the proposed Local Improvement District
but had no protest thereto.
The Council then determined that the persons who had protested
to the creation of the Local Improvement District constituted the
ownership of less than one-third of the owners in area and number
of the abutting, adjoining, contiguous and adjacent lots and lands
within such proposed improvement district.
The Council then discussed the advisability of the proposed
Local Improvement District, the benefit to the property and the
benefit to the owners thereof from the improvement to the propetty