Council Minutes 9/12/2006 (204)
I
I
I
Book 7-257
January 4, 1990
CITY OF AMMON
January 4, 1990
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Mayor and City Council:
The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 P.M. by Mayor C. Bruce Ard with the
following City Officials present:
Mayor C. Bruce Ard
Councilman Marvin J. Anderson
Councilman Michael B. Browning
Councilman Harvey L. Crandall
Councilman Greg J. Maeser
Attorney W. Joe Anderson
Engineer David E. Benton
Acting Public Works Dir. David Wadsworth
Fire Chief Cal L. Smith
City Clerk Aleen C. Jensen
Others present were:
David Beckman, The Post-Register
Hazen T. and Guila Olsen, 3210 East Sunnyside Road, Ammon
Rick Williams (City employee) 360 N. Monte Vista Avenue, Idaho Falls
Rex B. and Ileen Purcell, 3415 Molen Street, Ammon
Shawn Going (Scout)
Roger Stommel (Scout Leader) 3620 Taylorview Lane, Ammon
Brandon Hart (Scout)
Adam Farmer (Scout)
M. DeLynn Hansen, 3165 Western Avenue, Ammon
Merle Quigley, 2905 Western Avenue, Ammon
Hayse L. Whiteley, 3200 Midway, Ammon
Russell N. Swensen, 2660 Central Avenue, Ammon
ElDean Milligan, 3260 Romrell Lane, Ammon
Ben Patterson, 3110 Molen Street, Ammon
Stanley W. Cramer, 3040 South Ammon Road, Ammon
Dorian R. Crow, 2675 Romrell Lane, Ammon
Melvin and Donna Rosen, 2985 Meadow Lane, Ammon
Lester E. Hope, 3240 Central Avenue, Ammon
Ruth, Emily, and Dustin Ard, 3420 Senoma Circle, Ammon
Kay and MarJean Reiman, 3155 Rawson Stsreet, Ammon
Glenn Blatter, 3240 Molen Street, Ammon
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was directed by Councilman Maeser, and the
invocation was offered by Councilman Crandall.
City Clerk Aleen C. Jensen administered oaths of office to the following officials
elected at the November 7, 1989, municipal election:
Mayor C. Bruce Ard (four year term)
Councilman Harvey L. Crandall (two year term)
Councilman Michael B. Browning (four year term)
Councilman Marvin J. Anderson (four year term)
Councilman Browning moved to
December 7, 1989, as written.
call vote: Browning - Yes;
motion carried unanimously.
approve the minutes of City Council Meeting held on
The motion was seconded by Councilman Maeser. Roll
Maeser - Yes; Crandall - Yes; Anderson - Yes. The
Mayor Ard reooened the discussion tabled on December 7, 1989, on the request of
Kay and MarJean Reiman for a Special Use Permit to move on a double-wide
mobile/manufactured home on the property and increase the size of their already
non-conforming use. At the December 7 hearing, all of the testimony given was
in favor, and Mayor Ard asked if anyone desired to present testimony against the
request. Attorney Anderson was asked to research the issue in order to advise
the Council on possible actions that would conform with the state laws and City
ordinances. The attorney prepared the following letter:
Application was made to the City for the granting of a special use
permit to allow replacement of a manufactured home structure on a
location where there is presently existing a manufactured home. The
present manufactured home exists under the nonconforming use which was
utilized prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance. The present
request is to replace such manufactured home, which is a single-wide
unit, with another double-wide unit, which would be essentially twice
the floor space and size.
The Planning and Zoning Commission rej ected the application for the
special use permit and it proceeded to a hearing before the City
Council sitting as a Board of Adjustment.
State of Idaho Local Planning Act
The State of Idaho adopted the Local Planning Act, which is contained
258
January 4, 1990
in Chapter 65 of Title 67 of the daho Code. Local government units
of cities and counties are mandatedlto exercise the powers as conferred
in the Chapter to accomplish the' purposes expressed in protecting
property rights and enhancing proper y values.
Cities may adopt additional require ents in their planning and zoning,
but cannot oppose those which are ex res sed in the State Code.
Cities are required to have p1anni g and zoning commissions, adopt a
comprehensive plan and conduct the 1anning duties for the governmental
unit.
The provisions for adoption, amendm nt or repeal of any plan or zoning
ordinance are provided within the Code and these provisions must be
followed as to the necessary hearing and procedures.
I
Special or Conditiofa1 Use Permits
The City may provi~e, as part of i s zoning ordinance, for processing
applications for special or condit ona1 use permits. A special use
permit may be gran~ed to an app1ica t if the proposed use is otherwise
prohibited by the i terms of the 0 dinance, but may be allowed with
conditions under specific provision of the ordinance and when it is
not in conflict with the plan. .
The State Code requires hearings p ior to considering an application
for special or conditional use an provides that conditions may be
attached to a special use which wo 1d include, but not be limited to:
I
a. Minimizing adverse impact 0 other development;
b. Controlling the sequence an timing of development;
c. Controlling the duration of development;
d. Assuring that development i maintained properly;
I
f. Requiring the provision for on-site or off-site public
facilities or services; and
I
e. Designating the exact locat on and nature of development;
g. Requiring more restrictive tandards than those generally
required in an ordinance.
Studies may be required of t
environmental effects of the propose
shall not be considered as estab1i
other special use permits. A spec
from one parcel of land to another.
social, economic, fiscal and
special use. A special use permit
hing a binding precedent to grant
a1 use permit is not transferable
The ordinances of the City of Amm n also contain provl.sl.ons for the
applicability of a ppecia1 or condit ona1 use permit.
The Ammon Ordinanc~s in Section 11
conditional use permits. The 0
Adjustment to iSSUf a building pe
for the use of Lind and use of
determines is in hlarmony with the
zone in which the use is located.
7-8 make provision for special or
dinances authorize the Board of
it and/or certificate of occupancy
ui1ding, for use which the Board
bj ects and characteristics of the
The Idaho Code further provides each governmental unit shall
provide the processing of app1icati ns for variance permits. The Code
defines a variance as a modific tion of the requirements of the
ordinance as to lot size, lot cove ge, width, depth, front yard, side
yard, rear yard, set backs, parking space, height of buildings or other
ordinance provisions affecting the ize or shape of a structure or the
placement of a structure on lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall
not be considered a right or a sp cia1 privilege, but may be granted
to an applicant only upon a sho ing of undue hardship because of
characteristics of the site and th t the variance is not in conflict
with the public interest. Hearin s shall be held before granting a
variance.
I
Variance
The ordinance of the City also provi es for variances as follows:
Janua~~o~, 719~O
The Ammon Ordinances in Section 11-7-8 (2) make prOV1S1on for variance
in the cases where there is an exceptional narrowness, shallowness or
shape of a specific lot or parcel of land or by reason of peculiar
topographical features or other special circumstances, peculiar to the
particular lot or parcel of land that strict application of the terms
of the Ordinance would deprive the owner of privileges commonly enjoyed
by other properties of the same zone. Before a variance can be granted,
there must be certain evidence and findings which are set forth.
Nonconforming Use
I
The use of the single-wide manufactured home has been maintained as a
nonconforming use, as having been in existence at the time the zoning
ordinance was adopted. It is not in conformity with the building code,
nor with the zoning.
Nonconforming ordinances, as does Ammon's, allows for the replacement
and rebuilding of a manufactured home on a nonconforming use, but does
not allow an extension or enlargement of the area. A continuance of
a nonconforming use which would expand or enlarge the area would require
an amendment of our ordinance. The ordinances of other jurisdictions
in this area seem to be quite uniform in providing that any enlargement
or extension of the size of the structure in a nonconforming use would
not be permitted.
I believe a distinction could be made, if the ordinances were desired
to be amended, that the use be determined by the type of use that is
made rather than the size of the use. That is, if it is still to be
used as an R-l family residence as a single family residence, that
whether or not it was enlarged or extended would not change the use and
therefore the nonconforming use would still exist and would still
continue into the new or expanded area.
Change of Zone
I
The ordinances of the City do provide for a zoning for manufactured
homes. While the manufactured homes do not meet the Uniform Building
Code, as adopted by the City of Ammon, there are provisions that allow
this zone and, if constructed within that zone, they do meet
requirements. This would require a zone change to allow manufactured
homes in any present area of the City. This, possibly, could be
accomplished with an overlay zone where manufactured housing zones would
be allowed in an overlay in the certain area of the City and on such
locations as they presently are situated.
Change the Building Code to Allow HUD Approved Buildings to Conform
If this were adopted, then the manufactured homes which meet HUD
approval and inspection would qualify for placement within the City on
the applicable zoning lot of R-l, R-2, etc.
Possible courses of action for the Board of Adjustment would be as
follows:
1. Do nothing, deny the request and let the ordinances continue
as they are.
I
2. Amend the zoning ordinances to allow a petition for a variance
to come within the scope of the request. This would involve making a
variance from a use standpoint rather than a physical, geographical fact
and I think would be opposed to the concept of a variance. However,
it is a possibility. This would require an amendment to the ordinances
with the hearing procedures as set forth.
3. Grant the special use request as being in harmony with the
characteristics of the zone and grant the request with conditions. This
would require the abandonment of the nonconforming use.
4. Amend the zoning ordinances to allow a nonconforming use to be
continued or enlarged to be within the scope of the request. This would
require an amendment to the ordinances with the hearing procedures as
set forth.
5. Change the zoning to allow manufactured housing in certain
areas with the possibility of an overlay zone to meet the obj ects of
the request. This would require a change in zoning with the hearing
procedures.
260
January 4, 1990
6. Change the Building Code to
manufactured housiqg to be placed
within the City. rhis would requi
the hearing procedute. (Letter - W.
I
I
Councilman Maeser clarified option No.
brought out a provision of our ordinance
is determined to be in harmony with the
1 zone, a special use permit could only
of ownership.
Spokesman Rex Purcell brought out that
is not necessarily for a Special Use Pe
upgrade of this facility.
allow HUD approved and inspected
n appropriate zoned dwelling lots
e amendment to the ordinances and
oe Anderson - January 4, 1990)
dealing with a special use permit. He
not previously discussed. If the request
bjectives and characteristics of the R-
e granted if it did not survive a change
petition or request of the Reiman's
but for some mechanism to permit the
I
The Council and citizens discussed the 0 tions. Citizen input was received from
Ben Patterson, MarJean Reiman, Merle Qu gley, Stanley Cramer, Rex Purcell, and
Kay Reiman. It was suggested that the d uble-wide unit be inspected to determine
whether or not it meets the Uniform Bu.lding Code. If it does meet code, that
would eliminate the non-conforming use. ayor Ard recommended to the Council that
Acting Public Works Director David Wad worth contact Steve Serr of Bonneville
County to have him make an inspection t see if the unit in question meets UBC
standards or what would be necessary to ring it in compliance with UBC. Reimans
and the Council accepted the Mayor's re ommendation. Councilman Browning moved
to table action on the request of Kay an MarJean Reiman for a Special Use Permit
until Council Meeting o~ January 18, 199. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Maeser. Roll call vote: I Browning - Yes; Maeser - Yes; Anderson - Yes; Crandall -
Yes. The motion carried! unanimously.
Annette M. Cowle and Christine P. McMic
with the City Office for a home occu ati
window tinting). The applicants were u
Cowley discussed their request with the
making appointments by telephone, work 0
and do not plan any signs. They plan t
develops satisfactorily, they will pr
Councilman Browning expressed concern ab
no prob lem if they would agree to limi t
to approve the application for a home oc
by Annette M. Cowley and Christine P. McM
parking. The motion was seconded by Coun
Yes; Browning Yes; Anderson Yes
unanimously.
ael, 3616 Samuel Street, filed a request
n ermit for Added Touch Unlimited (auto
able to attend the meeting, so Annette
Mayor on the telephone. They will be
only one car at a time in their garage,
try the business for a year and, if it
bably look for a business location.
ut parking on Samuel Street, but he saw
the parking. Councilman Crandall moved
upation permit for Added Touch Unlimited
chael at 3616 Samuel Street with limited
ilman Browning. Roll call vote: Crandall-
Maeser Yes. The motion carried
I
Councilman Crandall moved to renew the etail store and retail beer license for
the ear 1990 for Stokes Food Center, 2510 East 17th Street. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Maeser. Roll ca I vote: Crandall - Yes; Maeser - Yes;
Anderson - Yes; Browning!- Yes. The moti n carried unanimously.
I
!
Mayor Ard gave a State of the Cit messa During the 1989 fiscal year, the City
made some good progress. Some major im rovements have been made in our Water
Department. We worked on the second yea of our street improvement program. The
Ammon Road proj ect is moving along. W won't see much visually, but lots of
planning needs to be completed by fall. he Fire Department has made some positive
improvements including completion of the Mutual Aid Agreement with Ucon, and they
are working on a list of priorities. oals for the Council to think about and
work on are--continue with the street imp ovement program, keep Ammon Road project
moving forward, continue with upgrade of the wells, repair the roof of the City
Building, and move the Fire Department t Well No. 7 as soon as possible. Other
things to consider--appointment of the ublic Works Director, widening some of
the roads in the old part of Ammon, tr ining of City employees, appointment of
a Board of Adjustments, and appointme t of a cleanup committee. Mayor Ard I
encouraged everyone to work together to u ite Ammon, and he expressed appreciation
for the support given to him. Assignment will be made at a later meeting.
Reports: Engineer Benton received a call
received the flood plain information, bu
Fire Chief Cal Smith reported on the Fi
meeting with state repr,esentatives, the
The purpose is to discu$s upgrading the
fire rating. The meeti~g was scheduled
P.M. Claims were approv~d. Councilman
Councilman Maeser secon~ed the motion.
ATTEST:
aL~--/ (l
CITY CLERK
. ;;/t-~PL-)
from Chuck Steele of F. E.M.A. He has
he had not been able to work on it yet.
De artment, and he discussed a special
City Council, and the Fire Department.
epartment, equipment, and improving our
for Thursday, January 25, 1990, at 7:00
rowning moved to adj ourn the meeting.
The meeting was adjo at 8:35 P.M.